Friday, August 26, 2011

Week 10: LoTI


Description: http://james.lqhome.com/images/resources/publications/lotilogomain2011.pngThe Levels of Teaching Innovation (LoTi) Framework was first conceptualized by Dr. Chris Moersch in 1994 as a research tool to assess authentic classroom technology use. Several iterations later, the original LoTi Framework has transformed into a conceptual model to measure classroom teachers implementation of the tenets of digital-age literacy as manifested in the National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS-T). The LoTi Framework focuses on the delicate balance between instruction, assessment, and the effective use of digital tools and resources to promote higher order thinking, engaged student learning, and authentic assessment practices in the classroom--all vital characteristics of 21st Century teaching and learning.
  • LoTi Level 0 - Non-use
    At a Level 0 (Non-Use), the instructional focus can range anywhere from a traditional direct instruction approach to a collaborative student-centered learning environment. The use of research-based best practices may or may not be evident, but those practices do not involve the use of digital tools and resources.

    The use of digital tools and resources in the classroom is non-existent due to (1) competing priorities (e.g., high stakes testing, highly-structured and rigid curriculum programs), (2) lack of access, or (3) a perception that their use is inappropriate for the instructional setting or student readiness levels. The use of instructional materials is predominately text-based (e.g., student handouts, worksheets).


  • LoTi Level 1 - Awareness
    At a Level 1 (Awareness), the instructional focus emphasizes information dissemination to students (e.g., lectures, teacher-created multimedia presentations) and supports the lecture/discussion approach to teaching. Teacher questioning and/or student learning typically focuses on lower cognitive skill development (e.g., knowledge, comprehension).

    Digital tools and resources are either (1) used by the classroom teacher for classroom and/or curriculum management tasks (e.g., taking attendance, using grade book programs, accessing email, retrieving lesson plans from a curriculum management system or the Internet), (2) used by the classroom teacher to embellish or enhance teacher lectures or presentations (e.g., multimedia presentations), and/or (3) used by students (usually unrelated to classroom instructional priorities) as a reward for prior work completed in class.


  • LoTi Level 2 - Exploration
    At a Level 2 (Exploration) the instructional focus emphasizes content understanding and supports mastery learning and direct instruction. Teacher questioning and/or student learning focuses on lower levels of student cognitive processing (e.g., knowledge, comprehension) using the available digital assets.

    Digital tools and resources are used by students for extension activities, enrichment exercises, or information gathering assignments that generally reinforce lower cognitive skill development relating to the content under investigation. There is a pervasive use of student multimedia products, allowing students to present their content understanding in a digital format that may or may not reach beyond the classroom.


  • Level 3 - Infusion
    At a Level 3 (Infusion), the instructional focus emphasizes student higher order thinking (i.e., application, analysis, synthesis, evaluation) and engaged learning. Though specific learning activities may or may not be perceived as authentic by the student, instructional emphasis is, nonetheless, placed on higher levels of cognitive processing and in-depth treatment of the content using a variety of thinking skill strategies (e.g., problem-solving, decision-making, reflective thinking, experimentation, scientific inquiry). Teacher-centered strategies including the concept attainment, inductive thinking, and scientific inquiry models of teaching are the norm and guide the types of products generated by students using the available digital assets.

    Digital tools and resources are used by students to carry out teacher-directed tasks that emphasize higher levels of student cognitive processing relating to the content under investigation.


  • Level 4a – Integration: Mechanical
    At a Level 4a (Integration: Mechanical) students are engaged in exploring real-world issues and solving authentic problems using digital tools and resources; however, the teacher may experience classroom management (e.g., disciplinary problems, internet delays) or school climate issues (lack of support from colleagues) that restrict full-scale integration. Heavy reliance is placed on prepackaged materials and/or outside resources (e.g., assistance from other colleagues), and/or interventions (e.g., professional development workshops) that aid the teacher in sustaining engaged student problem-solving. Emphasis is placed on applied learning and the constructivist, problem-based models of teaching that require higher levels of student cognitive processing and in-depth examination of the content.

    Students use of digital tools and resources is inherent and motivated by the drive to answer student-generated questions that dictate the content, process, and products embedded in the learning experience.


  • Level 4b – Integration: Routine
    At a Level 4b (Integration: Routine) students are fully engaged in exploring real-world issues and solving authentic problems using digital tools and resources. The teacher is within his/her comfort level with promoting an inquiry-based model of teaching that involves students applying their learning to the real world. Emphasis is placed on learner-centered strategies that promote personal goal setting and self-monitoring, student action, and issues resolution that require higher levels of student cognitive processing and in-depth examination of the content.

    Students use of digital tools and resources is inherent and motivated by the drive to answer student-generated questions that dictate the content, process, and products embedded in the learning experience.


  • Level 5 - Expansion
    At a Level 5 (Expansion), collaborations extending beyond the classroom are employed for authentic student problem-solving and issues resolution. Emphasis is placed on learner-centered strategies that promote personal goal setting and self-monitoring, student action, and collaborations with other diverse groups (e.g., another school, different cultures, business establishments, governmental agencies) using the available digital assets.

    Students use of digital tools and resources is inherent and motivated by the drive to answer student-generated questions that dictate the content, process, and products embedded in the learning experience. The complexity and sophistication of the digital resources and collaboration tools used in the learning environment are now commensurate with (1) the diversity, inventiveness, and spontaneity of the teacher's experiential-based approach to teaching and learning and (2) the students' level of complex thinking (e.g., analysis, synthesis, evaluation) and in-depth understanding of the content experienced in the classroom.


  • Level 6 - Refinement
    At a Level 6 (Refinement), collaborations extending beyond the classroom that promote authentic student problem-solving and issues resolution are the norm. The instructional curriculum is entirely learner-based. The content emerges based on the needs of the learner according to his/her interests, needs, and/or aspirations and is supported by unlimited access to the most current digital applications and infrastructure available.

    At this level, there is no longer a division between instruction and digital tools/resources in the learning environment. The pervasive use of and access to advanced digital tools and resources provides a seamless medium for information queries, creative problem-solving, student reflection, and/or product development. Students have ready access to and a complete understanding of a vast array of collaboration tools and related resources to accomplish any particular task.
LoTI gives us clear descriptions and expectations as well for us to know the level of technology integrated into our classroom.

I think, what I had in my class before was in :
LoTI level 1 - Awareness.
At a Level 1 (Awareness), the instructional focus emphasizes information dissemination to students (e.g., lectures, teacher-created multimedia presentations) and supports the lecture/discussion approach to teaching. Teacher questioning and/or student learning typically focuses on lower cognitive skill development (e.g., knowledge, comprehension).

Digital tools and resources are either (1) used by the classroom teacher for classroom and/or curriculum management tasks (e.g., taking attendance, using grade book programs, accessing email, retrieving lesson plans from a curriculum management system or the Internet), (2) used by the classroom teacher to embellish or enhance teacher lectures or presentations (e.g., multimedia presentations), and/or (3) used by students (usually unrelated to classroom instructional priorities) as a reward for prior work completed in class.

I let students to communicate with me through e-mail informally. It was not the obligation for the students to deliver questions or problems or sometimes tasks/homeworks through this tool, but they can access the curriculum through internet. so basically, we were aware that there were tools to support our learning process but never considering them as part of teaching-learning aids (Thanks to this UO summer course and Donna; and now, with my new teaching plan, we will be in:
Level 3 - Infusion
At a Level 3 (Infusion), the instructional focus emphasizes student higher order thinking (i.e., application, analysis, synthesis, evaluation) and engaged learning. Though specific learning activities may or may not be perceived as authentic by the student, instructional emphasis is, nonetheless, placed on higher levels of cognitive processing and in-depth treatment of the content using a variety of thinking skill strategies (e.g., problem-solving, decision-making, reflective thinking, experimentation, scientific inquiry). Teacher-centered strategies including the concept attainment, inductive thinking, and scientific inquiry models of teaching are the norm and guide the types of products generated by students using the available digital assets.

Digital tools and resources are used by students to carry out teacher-directed tasks that emphasize higher levels of student cognitive processing relating to the content under investigation.

Based on my project plan, I then will on purpose enhance the teaching method and use/apply technology like web, e-mail, class blog, assessment tools, webQuest to share tasks and students will sporadically or may be regularly use the tools aforementioned to fulfill the tasks required.

I hope this plan can be implemented well and finally I can go on to the next level.

Lets enjoy the last WEEK!

Monday, August 22, 2011

Week 9: Learning Styles

Hi everybody!

It is true that knowing our students' learning style is a "vital weapon" to help us in delivering  the knowledge to them. What I have in my mind when reading the research findings conveyed by Terry O'Connor from Indiana State University "Using Learning styles to Adapt Technology for Higher Education" we realized that  learning is not only for our students by for us as well to help us to be a better teacher.

Today, IT has become part of our daily life.  I like IT very much, because IT can take me 'everywhere'.

Technology, then, will be my 'new partner' in fulfilling my dreams to be able to share  to students. I will use it to enhance the teaching that I've never done before. Fortunately, my campus can facilitate us well and I found my students (as I often meet them almost everyday in class)   are familiar with technology as well (sometimes they are more modern than us).

But the most important thing is creating the best method of teaching through students' eyes, and knowing their learning styles better will help us in enhancing it. The chart provided by Colin Rose: http://www.chaminade.org/INSPIRE/learnstl.htm will help me a lot when determining the students learning styles. and then I can elaborate Richard M. Felder classification to give the students, the suggestions to know how the learners help themselves.

Happy finding our students' learning style!

Sunday, August 14, 2011

Week 8 Online Tools


Hi everyone!

It's been a very tough week and I think this is the hardest one for me. I have a lot of things to this week. This wee I got a special assignment from my Dean. I had to participate as one of the reviewer for evaluating the English Books for Junior and senior high school students. Wow! It's a very nice experience for me, because I was chosen as one of the 40 reviewers here in my country in Indonesia. The work itself was very exhausting, because I have to spent about 12 to 13 hours each day but very valuable indeed for me, to meet and share knowledge with my new friends there, English teachers from all over my country.

Catching up with the tasks given for this week, I truly got problems. I hardly difficult to do all the assignments while at the same time I had to finish the task from my Dean as well. However, I did my best to finish everything, and now I am still doing some works about this week assignments.

The main topic of this week is about Online Tools. I found ANVILL is an amazing tools, I hope I know it earlier. To make my project success, I have created some online tools.


Since I have to use my campus sites for teaching purpose, so here is my sites URL for this project
Here are the addresses

https://sites.google.com/a/widyatama.ac.id/meita-and-classes/ (sites address)
https://sites.google.com/a/widyatama.ac.id/meita-and-classes/essay-writing-1 (The menu for course's description)
https://sites.google.com/a/widyatama.ac.id/meita-and-classes/essay-writing-1/task-1 (The menu for class assignement)
Class Blog URL
http://ewriting1.blogspot.com/ (The address for posting and commenting tasks or assignments)
and as a supplementary site, I use webquest also. Here is the URL
http://www.zunal.com/webquest.php?w=108896

Sunday, August 7, 2011

Week 7: Learner Autonomy

Hi there!

This week has given me a lot of exposure in exploring learner autonomy. As I mentioned in the discussion thread that the paradigm has changed from teacher-centered to learner-centered. Students can do things to improve what they have. They can decide by themselves what activities they will do or they can ask someone or the teacher to help them know what to do.

Just like Little (1991:4) mentioned that by encouraging learners to self-direct learning, It is expected to assume greater responsibility for, and take change of, their own learning.

I agree with what Thanasoulas said that'however, learner autonomy does not mean that the teacher becomes redundant, abdicating his/her own control over what is transpiring in the language learning process. In my opinion, autonomous learners can be divided into two kinds. They are what we call as:
1. Fully autonomous-learner, where learner has a full access to decide what learning style, materials, level or even where they want to do the learning process. Teacher can be conditioned as resource person.
2. Semi autonomous-learner, here where Teacher and learner should work together to enhance their own and their students'autonomy just like Sheu said in his article- http://coyote.miyazaki-mu.ac.jp/learnerdev/LLE/8.1/smithE.html. Here Teacher has more role in encouraging, motivating or leading the students to do some activities for helping them to take responsibility for their own learning. Further Sheu explained that he found that the activities could encourage those who were less motivated to learn by choosing and doing what they wanted and liked, and sharing with friends.

For being an autonomous learner student can use technology or without it. From the lesson I got this week, I found various alternatives to do for letting the students have their learning autonomy.

See you all next week!